![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjHyd5PrYczoARK3m4YJohUImF7Jr0OcqP13sQMDwkJvhIDWMqymlpXG2zZSz82hoZwcF-fbyDu4YNjN7fhCATp9LKzKlQy55DGFc2MgSdgaiPEg6-8Vnr0iIWv8ySkIIHWmLPvYoh-is4/s320/ONeill.jpg)
Employers often require new employees to sign an agreement not to compete as a condition of their job offer. But what happens when the employee needs to leave a position and cannot find a new position that doesn't violate the covenant not to compete? The answer is unpredictable. Professor O'Neill proposes, in part 1, a four-factor rationale for determining "the contractual significance of an employee's assent" to one of these covenants. Part 2 examines and summarizes regulation of these covenants in the 50 states. Part 3 provides a detailed analysis of an employee's case in Washington state and applies the proposal to the facts of that case.
No comments:
Post a Comment