This post is part of this week's Diverse Voices series, on the topic of articles. Recent thoughtful and
generous scholarship has offered valuable critiques of traditional social
justice practices and values, such as implicit bias testing and free speech. This
scholarship pushes us to examine not only a racist, misogynistic and ableist
culture but also the tools we use to criticize and understand that culture.
Additionally, the popular press has provided a platform for
more “on-the-ground” perspectives, humanizing the abstract. The piece from The
Cut, below, illustrates in personal terms how casual but vicious racism can
inflict serious and long-term harm on POC impacting careers and mental health.
Racism
at My Job Literally Gave Me PTSD by Erika Stallings – Stallings discusses
how a racist partner at her first legal job gave unfair performance reviews
because she is black leading to her PTSD. The resultant anxiety and trauma
impacted her mental health and her ability to enjoy her work at subsequently
positions. She interviews a doctor studying this phenomena and another
professional who experience similar treatment at Vox Media.
Lawyering
with Challenges: Disability and Empowerment by Stuart Pixley – Pixley is a
Washington attorney working in-house with Microsoft. Here he writes about his challenges
practicing with cerebral palsy, from practical considerations, such as cramped
conference rooms, to confronting traditional notions of what an attorney “looks
like.”
‘Continually
Reminded of Their Inferior Position’: Social Dominance, Implicit Bias,
Criminality and Race by Darren Lenard Hutchinson – Professor Hutchinson
writes about the success of implicit bias theory in developing an understanding
of personal racism. However, he critiques the theory as being insufficient to
explain broad social tolerance of racism and racial inequality. He specifically
examines this phenomena within criminal law and law enforcement.
Toxic
Misogyny and the Limits of Counterspeech by Lynne Tirrell – Professor
Tirrell offers a more academic look at misogynist American culture and the
harmful speech arising therefrom. She argues that more speech is not a
sufficient response and that traditional First Amendment dogma struggles to
contend with the present and real misogyny of American law and politics.